English Language Article Comparison Essay Example for Free

English Language Article Comparison EssayIn this piece of oeuvre I ordain be comparing two intelligence informations from newspapers. twain the articles are close the same fiction and were printed on the same day (Tuesday October 13th 1998), however they are from two different newspapers. One of them is from The solarise and the other from The telecommunicate, the main difference between these two papers is that The sunbathe is a tabloid and The telecommunicate is a broadsheet. Throughout this piece of work I leave try to examine the difference in their attitudes towards writing news due to this variation in category of newspaper. The article concerns pass overs that were at a guard dog training unit, the instructor allegedly forced a handler to heraldic bearing and hang the dogs, genius of the dogs involved died. The first and most distinctive issue you literalise about these two stories is the difference in headlines. Firstly in The Telegraph the height of the letters involved is scarcely approximately 1cm where as in The Sun it is 2. 6cm. This clearly shows that The Sun takes to make a larger impact and draw your attention to that special falsehood.Other points about the headlines that back this up are the style of writing. In The Telegraph the headline has been pen in serif, this message that the editor has decided to persona a font which take ons small decorative lines at the ends of letters, however The Suns headline is in sans serif and so doesnt have these lines. This makes the letters much(prenominal) more than sharp, and right-angled this gives a hard ol itemory modality to the terminology and helps attract immortaliseers.Another way the editor has used the headline to attract the contri hardlyor in The Sun is by using block capitals, this instantly makes the letters bigger, reject out and coupled with the manner of speaking being in bold black and sans serif gives a real shock effect. A similarity between these t wo headlines though is that they both use quotes, this makes it sound and timber more real to a reader because it says exactly what actual people verbalise and aft(prenominal) having read the subheadline, probably what they said in court. However, I personally feel that the main difference is the actual words that have been used.The Suns headline is much more emotive, it uses words such as cruel, kick and death. These words will instantly capture people and conjure up images that will stir their imagination and make them want to read on. non only this but the headline in addition reads kick his own dog to death, this makes it front even worse because it wasnt a dog belonging to the police but his own family pet. It makes the whole thing seem even more cruel and will once again make people more interested in the paper, especially for people who have pet dogs.However, The Telegraph is much more enlightening and factual, it makes a statement about what happened without going i nto detail about the emotions of it. It says Police told to kick and punch dogs, although it does uses words such as kick and punch it uses them in a way to inform what the police had been told to do and doesnt go into detail about what the trainer was like. I also feel an interesting thing to also look at is the use of made and told in these two headlines.When The Sun says made cop kick his own god to death it uses made to incriminate the trainers, it makes it sound like the policemen didnt have a natural selection and that the whole incident was the trainers fault. Whereas The Telegraph uses told, this is much more informative and is manifestly saying what happened, there is no emotional influence in the way The Telegraph have written this headline. The subheadlines are also kinda interesting, firstly their placing, The Telegraph has decided to place the subheadline before the main headline and in The Sun it has been primed(p) after the headline. This may have been make for a number of reasons.In The Telegraph the subheadline reads German Shepard died after punishment, court told this subheadline has probably been used to give the reader a bit more instruction about the story before they read on like the type of dog involved and the fact that the dog died. In The Sun they have decided to roll the information that the dog died in their headline and the fact it was a German Shepard isnt mentioned in The Sun at all. On to The Suns subheadline and it simply reads Jury told of punishment this has been put after the headline to inform the reader of where the quote of the headline came from.As head as this in The Sun not only does it have a subheadline after the headline, it also has other subheadlines throughout the story to introduce new busts of the article and to split it into trinity parts the extra subheadlines are Warned and Shaking. These words are actually used in the section of the article they introduce so that the reader will want to continue. You notice these words and they stand out because they are precise expressive and they give you information about what is going to happen in the article even if you dont read on.I also feel that The Sun has used these particular words to good use, if you didnt have time to read the whole article and only read the headline and these subheadlines you would leave with a very strong feeling of hatred towards the trainers. Not only with words like made which I have already explained, but when it is followed by a subheadline of warned it makes you feel as though the police were threatened by the trainers and were warned by them to do nothing wrong. I personally feel that The Telegraph has a more hard-hitting headline for a particular reason.The Sun has made its main headline strike out of the page and really make you read on, this means they have put a simple subheadline so as not to overshadow the headline. Whereas The Telegraph has done it the other way around, their headline is not s o hard-hitting so the editor has decided to include an emotive subheadline to aid the reader in being interested in the story and to red on. aft(prenominal) having seen the headlines and been attracted to the story you begin to read the main text.Straight away in the hook divide you cigarette see differences in the papers attitudes. Firstly, and most obviously the fact that in The Sun the first paragraph has been written in bold, and simply written normally in The Telegraph. Once again it seems that The Sun has been much more emotive in its approach. speech such as forced and kicked it are used, not only this but the word DIED is written in block capitals, this is to emphasise the word and everything it means and the horror of what happened to the dogs. Words used in The Telegraph are very interesting.The first line explains that the dogs were chastised, it is interesting they should use this word because although it is hard hitting it probably doesnt have the same effect on you as kicking (which is in The Sun). However The Telegraph does say that dogs were hung helplessly from a wall by their leads this is then followed by a court was told yesterday it is as though The Telegraph wants to remain on the fence by simply stating what was said but at the same time drumming up emotion in the reader and making them read on, all in all The Sun is more opinionated and The Telegraph is try as best it can to stay factual.A similarity between the two stories is the use of quotation. Both articles have many quotes from the police officers and trainers in question and almost all of the quotes were said in court. This could well be because on the day these two articles were published the case was still in court and they had flyspeck else to go on than this. Also the writer of the article in The Sun has done something slightly unmatched in that he has decided to put some paragraphs into italics. This is almost certainly to draw the readers attention to that part of th e story and make them read and think about it a different way.There are three paragraphs throughout the article that are in italics and out of these two of them focus on the cruelty to the animals, they go into detail about the way in which this happened and how the dogs reacted to it. The third paragraph describes how two of the handlers left in sound off to what was going on before the dog died. Both these points are quite significant to the overall story and you can see why the writer may well have wanted the reader to be more aware of these facts that perhaps other points. Another point that I have found very interesting is sentence type used in both articles.It is normal for newspapers to use a can of declarative sentences, these help the reporter to get across to the reader all the important information apace and easily. An example from The Sun would be PC James English told the court his dog Tazz had been hanged for growling and The Telegraph Trainers at the police dog uni t, based at Sandon, Chelmsford, Essex. However, differences occur between the newspapers when you look at the use of complex sentences, these are more rarely used in papers as they are longish and are not so dramatic.However, as you would except it is The Telegraph that has used a couple but The Sun has used a lot fewer. As I have already described, The Telegraph is a more up-market paper and is aimed towards a sector of society who appreciate this sort of writing whereas The Sun is not. In fact a complex sentence has been used in The Telegraph to say the same as my last quotation of a declarative sentence from The Sun PC James English said his dog, Tazz was twice subjected to the hanging method after he had growled during training.