Greek Independence

For centuries the Hellenic population was all told under the faggot rule. The Hellenics independence from the Ottoman Turks in 1830 did non come without hardship and suffering. Several former(a) countries including Russia and France took sides with Greece during this fight as they matte close and connected with their culture. A nine year war was fought which at last resulted in the Greeks plusing independence from the Turks. During this time, the Greeks had to maintain high morale and a strong disposition to be as flourishing as they were in the end. The circumstances they were under were difficult and harsh.Many state felt as though Greece deserved to break away from the Ottoman conglomerate, however some believed that the Turkish rule was not too oppressing. Most community believed that the people of Greece had great char get alonger and deserved to be free from the barbarity of the Ottoman Turks. They were seen as having strong will to be independent and worked togeth er as a field to achieve that goal. Their culture still to this day is being represented in different forms of art, for example architecture. Its been studied for years because it served as a foundation for several other countries and is being kept alive, as opposed to forgotten.One poet, Alexandros Kalphoglou, described the Greeks as being enlightened, educated, well-rounded people. He went on to say that they were actually open to and accepting of other cultures. Its not surprising that Kalphoglou wouldve felt this way because he was a Greek Christian and nigh likely would be proud of his own history (Doc 4). Similarly, Percy Shelley was also a poet who believed Greek culture was essential for all other cultures to grow. She, however, was an English romantic poet. Itd be anticipate for her to praise Greece because romantic poets were all for the Greek revolution and independence (Doc 7).These two werent the only people who shared the same point of view on the Greek Revolt. Whi le still under the Ottoman rule, Greek citizens were treated unfairly and poorly. Their living conditions were unstable and were constantly in upheaval due to the monolithic rebellion. The entire revolution was sparked by the lack of support shown by the Turkish rulers toward the Greeks. The bright, upbeat, and beautiful presence of the Greek culture was robbed by the Turks according to Savary, a French scholar of Greek. As a person who most likely spent a majority of the time studying Greek history, he would be disposed to respect their culture (Doc 3).Sneyd Davis, an English writer, spoke of Athens being deteriorated and everything beautiful that once existed there, vanishing. The events of what happened to the Greeks under the Ottomans tramp be easily related to this poem because their rob in their past was diminished. Davis is another romantic poet so I would expect to see him pro-Greek revolution (Doc 1). A majority of people were pleased with the incident that Greece did gain its independence from the Ottoman Turkish Empire. They believed that Greeks should have their arts, language, and other forms of culture restored fully so that they could regain pride in themselves.People also scene that Greek revolution would result in more successful nations in the future, which would be based on Greek tradition. A pamphlet called Greek exiles described the arising of Greek ancestors as heroes in history. It talks about how the Ottomans may have once been at power, but years later they didnt stand a chance against the Greeks (Doc 6). In regards to Mavrocordato, it was a strong act of courage for the Greeks to take their independence and basically create their own government activity starting with nothing.Basically, he says that they precious and made peace for themselves, but worked hard to get to that point (Doc 10). In an engraving created in 1828, called Greece Sacrificed, Regnier has interpret a scene where the Turks are attacking the Greeks, but not very successfully due to the fact that the Greeks are holding their ground. Theyre standing for what they believe in as strong-minded individuals with a ordinary goal in mind (Doc 11). Although most would agree that the Greek revolution was a positive thing, there are some people that are on the complete opposite side of things.These people hold that the Turkish reign was not too overbearing, and that the Greeks couldve easily stayed under their control. A Turkish sultan named Mustapha III, in 1765 made orders very clear to the governor of northern Greece to try and stop the revolts being made by the Greeks. He went on to describe the problems that the Greek population had been causing such as robberies. He thought that the Greek revolution had caused more problems than it solved, and that it shouldve been stopped early. Because of the fact that he was a sultan of the Ottoman Empire I find it almost obvious that he was against the Greeks in their revolts.Mustapha wanted what was b est for his nation and people (Doc 2). In Vahids opinion, a Turkish governor, the revolution of the Greeks was driven by what he calls drunkards, meaning that he didnt take the rebellions seriously. Again, being of Turkish government, he would favor the Ottoman side of things (Doc 9). During the eighteenth and ordinal centuries Greece was driven to rebel against their previous rulers the Ottoman Turks. Their culture and everything they took pride in was meaningless in the Turks eyes.They felt they had to start a revolution to gain back the rights they deserved. During this revolt, they living conditions were not as good as they couldve been. In fact they were difficult to deal with, but this had only been a small hurdle for the Greek population who was determined to gain independence. Nothing could stand in their way, as they were a fearless, courageous nation. Finally, after suffering through nine years of antagonizing war and treachery, the Greeks gained their independence from t he Ottoman Turks and started to create a government as a unified country.